Marco Trungelliti vs Matteo Gigante Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 30 Apr at 11:31 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Trungelliti vs M. Gigante

ARG
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Trungelliti 1 - 0 Gigante
They have played 3 sets in total, with Marco Trungelliti winning 2 and Matteo Gigante winning 1. The last match between Marco Trungelliti and Matteo Gigante was at the Mauthausen Challenger, 30-04-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Draw getting the victory 4-6 7-6(10) 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Trungelliti | 1 |
| Gigante | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) Mauthausen Challenger(04-30-25)
M. Trungelliti vs M. Gigante H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $1,168,943 | Career Prize Money | $571,445 |
| 58.96% (602-419) | Career Total W/L | 57.68% (169-124) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 15 | Titles | 6 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0.00% (0-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.00% (5-5) |
M. Trungelliti vs M. Gigante Match Preview:
Analyzing the performance of Marco Trungelliti and Matteo Gigante in their forthcoming tennis match reveals intriguing insights through recent statistics and patterns. Over the past six months, Trungelliti has demonstrated a second serve win rate of 46.05%, narrowly surpassing Gigante's 43.8%, illustrating a slight edge in this crucial aspect of the game. While second serve performance is a significant indicator of match outcomes, another compelling metric to consider is how players fare under pressure. Trungelliti is more adept at saving breakpoints, successfully doing so 51.81% of the time, compared to Gigante’s 46.46%, making him potentially more resilient in critical stages of the match.
When evaluating return game performances, Gigante appears stronger on paper, winning 49.54% of his opponent's second serve points compared to Trungelliti's 45.85%. This edge extends to first serve returns, where Trungelliti has a minor advantage, securing 28.6% of first serve returns versus Gigante's 26.82%. In terms of converting breakpoint opportunities, Gigante holds an advantage with a rate of 34.75% against Trungelliti’s 31.82%, which might play a pivotal role in tipping the scales during the match.
Surface preferences also come into play; Trungelliti prefers clay, boasting a career win percentage of 61% on this surface, while Gigante excels on hard courts with a 71% win rate. However, both players demonstrate lower success rates on indoor hard courts, potentially negating any perceived advantage in this match format. Furthermore, match experience revealed that Trungelliti plays with players averaging a rank of 247.25, versus Gigante's more challenging average opponent rank of 206.67.
In terms of career progress within the last year's competitive landscape, Trungelliti and Gigante have predominantly competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments. Trungelliti has gathered a lower success rate, winning 48.48% of these encounters, whereas Gigante has been triumphant in 56.41% of his matches, showcasing a marginally stronger grasp of the competition tier. However, it's worth noting that Gigante has a considerably higher success rate in deciding sets, winning 74% compared to Trungelliti's 45%, which could be decisive in a match that extends all the way.
On assessing their overall performance, Gigante's greater winning percentage over the course of this year (55.17% compared to Trungelliti's 50.85%) seemingly positions him in a more favorable spot. Additionally, his historical performance and current form provide a stronger foundation for predictions. Based on these analytical comparisons and statistics, Matteo Gigante appears to be the favorite to emerge victorious in this match-up.
Marco Trungelliti vs Matteo Gigante Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Trungelliti vs M. Gigante H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 17 | Games Won | 15 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 2:55:23 | Average Match Time | 2:55:23 |
| 50% (61/123) | 1st Serve % | 59% (67/114) |
| 72% (44/61) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (42/67) |
| 42% (26/62) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (19/47) |
| 46% (6/13) | Break Pts Won % | 29% (5/17) |
| 46% (53/114) | Return Points Win % | 43% (53/123) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Trungelliti Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SF | L | 3-6 6-3 6-3 | ||
QF | W | 2-6 6-3 6-3 | ||
R2 | W | 6-2 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 7-5 6-7(3) 6-4 | ||
Q1 | L | 2-6 6-2 7-5 | ||
M. Gigante Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 4-2 ret. | ||
R2 | L | w/o | ||
R1 | W | 7-6(5) 7-5 | ||
R1 | L | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | ||
Q2 | L | 4-6 6-3 7-5 | ||

M. Trungelliti vs M. Gigante Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.96% (602/419) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.68% (169/124) |
| 55.55% (1352/1082) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.33% (384/310) |
| 51.68% (12097/11310) | Games Win/Loss | 51.96% (3409/3152) |
| 54.29% (95/80) | Hard Win/Loss | 67.44% (58/28) |
| 62.00% (483/296) | Clay Win/Loss | 59.26% (96/66) |
| 34.09% (15/29) | Indoor Hard W/L | 27.78% (10/26) |
| 39.13% (9/14) | Grass Win/Loss | 55.56% (5/4) |
| 0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.29 |
| 2733 | Aces Total | 934 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.31 |
| 2652 | Total Double Faults | 1012 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:35:50 |
| 534.65 | Average Opponent Rank | 360.6 |
| 57% (33388/58132) | 1st Serve % | 59% (11812/19965) |
| 68% (22651/33388) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (8068/11812) |
| 49% (12228/24744) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (4031/8153) |
| 42% (2555/6064) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (920/2128) |
| 41% (23534/57612) | Return Points Win % | 41% (8280/20212) |
| 55.10% (54/44) | Slam W/L | 57.69% (15/11) |
| 50.00% (7/7) | Masters W/L | 42.86% (6/8) |
| 50.93% (55/53) | Main Tour W/L | 18.18% (2/9) |
| 58.02% (340/246) | Challenger W/L | 57.07% (109/82) |
| 67.91% (146/69) | Futures W/L | 72.55% (37/14) |
| 59% (581/984) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (164/281) |
| 56% (10/18) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 38% (3/8) |
| 52% (177/339) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (51/91) |
| 61% (236/384) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (59/103) |
| 86% (533/460) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 79% (173/137) |
| 14% (533/73) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 20% (173/34) |
| 29% (488/142) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (120/30) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Sonay Kartal vs Jessica Pieri Prediction – WTA Open BLS de Limoges – 8th December 2025 Best Bets

Open BLS de Limoges – Limoges Preview And Prediction: Anhelina Kalinina vs Kathinka Von Deichmann Betting Tips & Picks December 8, 2025

Kamilla Rakhimova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Open In Arte Angers Loire – 6th December 2025 Best Bets

Open In Arte Angers Loire – Angers Preview And Prediction: Tamara Korpatsch vs Anna-Lena Friedsam Betting Tips & Picks December 6, 2025

Alycia Parks vs Tamara Korpatsch Prediction – WTA Open In Arte Angers Loire – 5th December 2025 Best Bets
